Methodology proposal to determine project management maturity level in engineering companies
Methodology proposal to determine project management maturity level in engineering companies
Barra lateral del artículo
PDF (English)
FLIP
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-NoDerivativa 4.0 Internacional
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
The purpose of this paper is to present a methodological proposal for small engineering companies to evaluate its project management maturity level. The proposal is based on a generic standard which was adjusted by consulting internal and external experts, to establish particular evaluation criteria and qualification scale to perform best practices evaluation. The proposal considers not only general maturity level qualification but also, by multivariate statistics, qualification by processes groups and experts groups. The proposal was validated through a case study, when applied in an engineering company, resulting on that external experts tend to qualify the maturity of management of projects higher than internal experts, the company´s employees.
Detalles del artículo
Referencias (VER)
Ahlemann, F., Teuteberg, F. & Vogelsang, K., 2009. Project management standards - Diffusion and application in Germany and Switzerland. International Journal of Project Management, 27(3), pp.292–303. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.01.009.
Andersen, E.S. & Jessen, S.A., 2003. Project maturity in organisations. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), pp.457–461.
Backlund, F., Chronéer, D. & Sundqvist, E., 2014. Project Management Maturity Models – A Critical Review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, pp.837–846. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814021855.
Brookes, N. & Clark, R., 2009. Using Maturity Models to Improve Project Management Practice. In POMS 20th Annual Conference. p. 11.
Cooke-Davies, T.J. & Arzymanow, A., 2003. The maturity of project management in different industries: An investigation into variations between project management models. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), pp.471–478.
Cooke-Davies, T.J., Schlichter, J. & Bredillet, C., 2001. Beyond the PMBOK guide. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Project Management Institute 2001 Seminars and Symposium, Nashville, TN.
Gray, C. & Larson, E., 2009. Administración de proyectos 4th ed. McGrawHill, ed.,
Guido, J. & Clements, J., 2007. Administración exitosa de proyectos 3rd ed., Thomson Editores.
Jiang, J.J. et al., 2004. An exploration of the relationship between software development process maturity and project performance. Information & Management, 41(3), pp.279–288.
Jugdev, K. & Thomas, J., 2002. Project Management Maturity Models: The Silver Bullets of Competitive Advantage? Project Management Journal, 33(4), p.4.
Kerzner, H., 2009. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling,
KPMG International, 2015a. Climbing the curve. Global construction survey 2015,
KPMG International, 2005. Global IT Project Management Survey,
KPMG International, 2015b. Project and programme management survey 2015,
KPMG International, 2013. Project Management Survey Report 2013,
Malhotra, N.K. & Peterson, M., 2001. Marketing research in the new millennium: emerging issues and trends. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 19(4), pp.216–232.
Mutafelija, B. & Stromberg, H., 2003. Systematic process improvement using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI,
Nunnally, J.C. & Bernstein, I., 1994. Psychometric Theory,
Office of Government Commerce, 2013a. P3M3 – Project Model.
Project Management Maturity Model. The Office of Government and Commerce, pp.1–23. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/2vwcp7b.
Office of Government Commerce, 2013b. Portfolio , Programme and Project Management Maturity Model (P3M3) Introduction and Guide to P3M3,
Office of Government Commerce, 2006. Portfolio, programme & project management maturity model (P3M3),
Polkovnikov, A. V. & Ilina, O.N., 2014. The Reality of Project Management Practice in Russia: Study Results. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, pp.805–810. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814021818 [Accessed October 10, 2014].
PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2012. Insights and Trends: Current Portfolio, Programme, and Project Management Practices. , pp.1–40. Available at: http://www.pwc.com/en_US/us/public-sector/assets/pwc-global-project-management-report-2012.pdf.
Project Management Institute-PMI, 2013. Organizational Project Management Maturity Model OPM3 Knowledge Foundation,
Project Management Institute-PMI, 2008. Organizational Project
Management Maturity Model Opm3. Project management, Standards, Mathematical models.,
Selleri Silva, F. et al., 2015. Using CMMI together with agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 58, pp.20–43.
Silva, D. et al., 2014. OPM3 ® Portugal Project : Analysis of Preliminary Results. Procedia Technology, 16, pp.1027–1036.
Solarte-Pazos, L. & Sánchez-Arias, L.F., 2014. Gerencia de proyectos y estrategia organizacional: El modelo de madurez en gestión de proyectos CP3M© V5.0. Innovar, 24(52), pp.5–18.
Vinacua, B.V. & Cañas, J.C.M. i, 2003. Análisis estadístico con SPSS 11.0 para Windows 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, ed.,
Von Wangenheim, C.G. et al., 2010. Best practice fusion of CMMI-DEV v1.2 (PP, PMC, SAM) and PMBOK 2008. Information and Software Technology, 52(7), pp.749–757.